God Of Thunder
May 8, 2011 § 3 Comments
I wanted to watch Thor because I thought it would be a solid action movie after the mild disappointment that was Fast Five. Thor seemed unique — very rarely do we get movies based on Norse myths, and having done no research except watching the trailer on TV, I had no idea this was a Marvel production. So I went into the movie with no expectations except to be entertained.
After watching it, though, I’d say that Thor was a bit of slapstick comedy combined with a lot of hot mess.
First of all, I forgot [or never knew] that Natalie Portman was in this movie. After all the hullabaloo with the Oscars and the ballet, I’m frankly tired of seeing her face everywhere despite having watched neither Black Swan nor No Strings Attached. My affection for her is waning in tandem with my love for James Franco.
Anyway. The main problem with Thor was that it tried to incorporate too much, which made for a baffling and sometimes incoherent narrative. There’s the brother vs. brother drama. Father vs. sons drama. Abduction and self-hatred drama. That random race of frost-giants drama. That frustratingly inexplicable split-second romance. The group of federal agents whose presence and purpose are never explained. How Natalie Portman is following sky-static in the middle of New Mexico with poly-sci major Kat Dennings and her dad’s old bud and is somehow getting college credit. And what exactly was that glowing blue cube??
Everything is just piled on, and I can understand that they tried to pour in so much in order to help the plot move along, but it was just too much. B even fell asleep on my shoulder for half an hour and essentially didn’t miss much.
Can I also point out the racism in this movie? The only Asian person in the whole film speaks with an accent. It would be fine except HE’S FROM ASGARD, the mythical realm in which EVERYBODY ELSE speaks with a Viking accent [LOL I don’t know how to describe it exactly]. I mean, I get that Tadanobu Asano is a Japanese actor and that’s probably just how he normally speaks English, but the perpetual foreigner thing really grates my nerves.
At one point during the second half of the movie, one of the secret agents sees the group of four warriors strolling down the quaint New Mexico street and mutters into his walkie-talkie, “We’ve got Xena, Jackie Chan,” and some other description I’ve since forgotten. It was funny — the theater laughed, because it was mostly true. I get the Xena reference; Jaimie Alexander played a female warrior who was dressed like this:
But what about this looks like Jackie Chan?? [Note that the agent was standing on a rooftop, so all he could really see was the hair/costume.]
It’s because he’s Asian, isn’t it? It’s the equivalent of calling a black guy Chris Rock just because he’s black.
The frost-giants looked like they were styled after the Green Goblin. It’s always interesting to see just how much a movie will make an alien look like a deformed humanoid. I get that we’re limited in our scope of imagination, but do foreign species really just have to look like people with acute epidermodysplasia verruciformis [I don’t know how to pronounce it either]?
I was surprised to see that Kenneth Branagh directed this film. I remember watching his many Shakespeare films in middle & high school English classes. Good to see that he’s moved on to bigger and better productions!
Lastly, let it be noted [once again] that I have a thing for blondes with icy blue eyes, so let’s take a moment to appreciate Chris Hemsworth in all his squinty Taylor-Swift-esque glory:
[Movie stills courtesy of Yahoo! Movies.]
Valentine’s Day Chocolate Fix: Hershey’s Drops
February 14, 2011 § 2 Comments
I gave in.
I admit that when I first saw the commercials for the new Hershey’s Drops, I was extremely skeptical. Why would Hershey’s try to copy M&M’s? I couldn’t even wrap my mind around the outrageousness of the idea enough to compose further questions.
Then, when I saw the bags of milk chocolate Drops on display at Walmart, I was interested to see that the tagline read, “No candy shell — no mess.” Isn’t that how M&M’s were marketed when they first came out? [Melts in your mouth, not in your hands…] And now Hershey’s is using that against Mars, Inc.
In any case, I scoffed and went on my way.
The second time, however, I had already been tempted twice by Hershey’s Cookies ‘n’ Creme chocolate bars by the time I came upon the Drops version, so I simply had to taste and review them — for the sake of enterprising journalism, of course.
Hershey’s Drops are big, about the size of quarters, and have a thin clear coating that seems to prevent the chocolate from melting. It was cold when DP and I tore into them in the parking lot, so we didn’t really have a chance to test the heat resistance of the coating.
The chocolate tastes just like a regular Cookies ‘n’ Creme bar, and the coating dissolves quickly and tastelessly. The Drops make the chocolate easy to share, but portion control is a disaster. DP and I ate half the bag after our midnight Walmart run and finished the rest on the way to church the next morning.
There’s not much more to say other than they’re pretty delicious. I don’t remember how much I paid for them, but it didn’t seem exorbitant for how much product came in the bag. Here’s another picture:
What’s Your Dream?
November 25, 2010 § Leave a comment
I detest the American movie industry for using 3D to squeeze more money out of consumers. Sure, Avatar was great, Alice In Wonderland was mediocre, but I’m sure I could’ve done without 3D in both. But it’s becoming unavoidable, and thankfully the new-ish theater in Naperville has $3 Wednesday specials for college students…to which another $3 was added because of the 3D. Sigh.
Anyway, this all leads me to my thoughts on Disney’s Tangled. I knew from seeing the preliminary sketches [last year? Years ago?] that I wanted to see this film. As I’ve mentioned before, Rapunzel is my favorite fairy tale, and now that I’m home, I have images from the picture book that I used to read over and over again.
The stories are different [in book version, Rapunzel’s love interest is the royal, not vice versa, and the old lady is an evil witch bent on revenge] but end pretty much in the same way.
Naturally, I LOVED the movie. The artistic design is amazingly beautiful, and although I’m still unconvinced as to the ultimate usefulness of 3D, I would say that the effects enhanced the animations. You can tell from the visual details that Disney didn’t try to half-ass this one.
Rapunzel is absolutely GORGEOUS. The male protagonist, Flynn, is also absurdly attractive, and together they make the most beautiful couple that I’ve ever seen on the big screen. [They’re currently battling Aurora/Philip as best-looking animated duo in my mind.] Seriously, though, her huge green eyes, his perfectly sculpted profile and slim hips, her obviously flawless golden hair…I could go on and on but that would probably creep out normal people.
The storyline has elements from The Little Mermaid, Cinderella, Sleeping Beauty, Aladdin, Enchanted, and many others, I’m sure. They were familiar concepts but didn’t feel recycled. It was as if Disney learned from their greatest films and used the best parts of all of them. The cute parts were SO cute, and the musical numbers were enjoyable, especially “Mother Knows Best.”
Rapunzel is a more realistic, lovable character. She’s talented, earnest, honest, and has ninja-like capabilities with her hair. The antagonist is depicted as a human character and not simply an old witch with inexplicable magical powers. Flynn’s character was extremely cookie-cutter, but honestly he was so good-looking that I could look past it……
I could keep blabbering, but you should just go watch it. The only criticism I recall is that the character of the horse is a bit too much. I mean, it was certainly amusing, but they took the character a little too far. In any case, this movie demonstrates that Disney can still be a healthy competitor for Pixar. I just want to watch it again and again!








